AT&T failed to convince a federal judge to vacate a legal precedent declaring that U-verse TV is a cable service. The telco had petitioned the US District Court of Connecticut to declare as moot that court’s July 2007 ruling striking down a finding by the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control from 2006.That regulators, in an action unique among state utility boards, proactively examined the Internet-delivered U-verse TV service. They came to the controversial conclusion that U-verse, because it delivers video in bits and bytes via the Internet and not in a continuous stream, does not meet the definition of a cable service. AT&T has consistently argued that U-verse is not a cable service and should not be regulated as such. But Judge Janet Bond Arterton ruled that U-verse does meet the legal definition of a cable service.

Other posts by :

1. Oman’s Spaceport ready for fast-track launches
2. Bank uplifts RocketLab
3. AST SpaceMobile’s BlueBird/FM1 en route to India
4. D2D satellite battle hots up
5. Eutelsat share price rockets
6. AST SpaceMobile recovers after Verizon agreement
7. Bank has mixed messages for AST SpaceMobile
8. EchoStar clears key regulatory hurdles for Starlink deal
9. Starlinks falling to Earth every day

Categories: Articles, Broadband, Cable, IPTV, OTT, Regulation